A guide to MP’s expenses

May 7th, 2009 by Richard Leave a reply »

So the Telegraph has got hold of MPs expenses before they officially published, stand by for some embarrassing back downs or corrections.

Guido has a great explanation of the phrases we’ll hear over the next few days. I’ve republished here

It has since been corrected” - I knew it was going to come out and it was such a blatant fiddle that I realised I had to repay the fraudulently claimed money before it came out.

The Fees Office approved the payment - the Fees Office always take the word of “honourable” members.  They always make the payment without question.

It was a clerical error” - it was a small fiddle.

Lessons have been learned - we have got away with it, but we won’t do it again.

We have to have two homes to do our job properly” - why stay in a hotel when we can build a property portfolio at the public’s expense.

Claims were made in good faith” - we have always got away with it in the past.

It was within the rules” - MPs make the rules to suit themselves. MPs are  lawmakers, judge and jury.  It is a joke at our expense.  They really are almost all at it. 

Advertisement

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.